Account context
Steam age, time played, family share, prior bans, profile privacy, and account setup are risk signals that help prioritize review.
Anti-Cheat Intelligence
Composite evidence beats lazy autobans.
TIRust anti-cheat strategy treats reputation data, server telemetry, staff reports, and behavioral signals as context. Strong action should come from composite evidence, not one brittle flag.
Network context
IP, country, ASN, proxy/VPN indicators, and related-player relationships can reveal evasion patterns without proving guilt alone.
Server behavior
Warnings, anti-hack messages, reports, suspicious combat patterns, movement anomalies, and session behavior should be retained as evidence.
False-positive discipline
Risk factors need weighting, decay, confidence levels, staff review, and appeal context. One weak signal should not become a permanent ban.
Evidence packets
Alerts should package who, what, where, when, source signal, confidence, related history, and recommended next review step.
Governed enforcement
Anti-cheat actions should follow TIRust governance standards and the operating standards.
Recommended action ladder
Flag low-confidence signals, alert staff on composite risk, restrict only when warranted, and reserve bans for strong evidence, confirmed evasion, severe abuse, or repeated violations.
Related pages
See Moderation Systems for staff workflow, Infrastructure for the telemetry platform, and AI Moderation for assisted review concepts.